【Syllabus of Latest Opinion】Supreme Court en banc Decision 2017Ma6438 Decided April 22, 2021【Order to Dismiss a Petition of Appeal (Agreed Amount)】
【Main Issues and Holdings】
In a case where a duplicate of a petition of appeal cannot be served in an appellate trial, whether the presiding judge of the appellate instance shall fix a reasonable period and order the appellant to correct the domicile of the appellee within such period in accordance with Article 402(1) and (2) of the Civil Procedure Act (affirmative), and when the appellant has failed to correct the domicile of the appellee within such period, whether the presiding judge of the appellate instance shall reject the petition of appeal by his/her order (affirmative)
Whether the foregoing legal doctrine of the Supreme Court precedents ought to be upheld (affirmative)
A회사의 정기예금 담보 대출금을 임의로 인출하여 펀드 환매자금으로 사용한 부분 (2) | 2024.02.06 |
---|---|
방송 3사가 연예인들이 프로그램에 출연한 대가인 출연료채권을 혼합공탁한 경우 (1) | 2024.02.05 |
부정경쟁행위 (0) | 2024.02.04 |
전속매니지먼트계약 (1) | 2024.02.03 |
Supreme Court Decision 2016Da33202, 33219 Decided June 3, 2021 【Damages (Etc.); Damages (Etc.)】 (0) | 2024.02.02 |